In 2019, the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) fined Google €50 million for violating GDPR. The ruling, known as Google v. CNIL (2019), proved that GDPR is not simply an abstract text – all companies, including corporations and market monopolists, must obey its provisions.

Decisions of high courts, such as this one, also prove useful in enforcing data privacy. Even if the decisions are made in a particular case between two entities or individuals, these rulings often explain legal provisions and are used as an additional set of legal principles. Historically, court decisions have had more impact in the US, which follows the case law system.

You may also like:

Data privacy laws in the United States and how they affect your business

11 new privacy laws around the world and how they’ll affect your analytics

Facebook Inc. v. Duguid

EU-US data privacy framework


  • Anonymous website visitor tracking: How to do useful analytics without personal data [Updated]

    Regulations worldwide, like GDPR or the ePrivacy Regulation, set a high bar for collecting user data. For one, GDPR requires consent to process the data if it’s reasonably likely that such data could be used to identify an individual. The problem is that consent opt-in rates typically vary between 30% and 70-80%. The solution? Anonymizing…

  • What is PII, non-PII, and personal data? [UPDATED]

    Personally identifiable information (PII) and personal data are two classifications of data that often confuse organizations that collect, store and analyze such data. Both terms cover common ground, classifying information that could reveal an individual’s identity directly or indirectly. PII is used in the US, but no specific legal document defines it. The legal system…