Facebook Inc. v. Duguid

Facebook Inc. v. Duguid is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the definition and function of autodialers. The main issue was Facebook’s notification system, which sends automated text messages to alert users of attempted logins to their accounts. Noah Duguid, who sued Facebook, argued that such notifications were illegal. However, the Supreme Court decided in favor of Facebook.

In the ruling, the US Supreme Court also clarified the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The Supreme Court ruled that autodialers are defined by their function to store or produce telephone numbers from a random or sequential number generator.

You may also like:

Data privacy laws in the United States and how they affect your business

11 new privacy laws around the world and how they’ll affect your analytics

Google v. CNIL

AI and privacy


  • Five things every marketer should know about web analytics in 2026

    Web analytics is changing fast. AI is moving from buzzword to actual business impact, privacy rules keep shifting on both sides of the Atlantic, and marketing teams are rethinking their tool stacks. What does this mean for analytics strategy in 2026? We asked industry experts to share their predictions.

  • first party data

    First-party analytics without consent: Your Digital Omnibus compliance guide

    The Digital Omnibus is the European Commission’s simplification initiative to modernize the EU’s digital rulebook and reduce consent fatigue. The framework would enable first-party analytics without consent when specific criteria are met, ending years of uncertainty about the use of legitimate interest for web statistics.