Server-side tracking vs. client-side tracking

In analytics, server-side and client-side tracking are methods used to send data collected from a browser to an analytics platform.

In client-side tracking, data is sent directly to the analytics service. This method is popular because it’s well-documented and easy to set up without advanced technical skills. However, the data gathered with this method becomes more and more unreliable.

Server-side tracking offers more control over data collection and processing as well as better quality of data. In this method, data collection happens outside the browser, with communication occurring directly between the website server and the analytics platform.

A hybrid method of server-side tracking, also known as a first-party collector, combines the ease of client-side data collection with the control and security of server-side tracking. Although hybrid tracking might slightly compromise data accuracy because it still partly relies on the browser, it’s more convenient to use than a purely client-side approach.

It’s important to underline that companies using server-side tracking to gather personal data must clearly explain their tracking methods in their privacy policies. They also have to get visitor consent to collect personal data, just like they would with client-side trackers.

Learn more about server-side tracking:


  • first party data

    First-party analytics without consent: Your Digital Omnibus compliance guide

    The Digital Omnibus is the European Commission’s simplification initiative to modernize the EU’s digital rulebook and reduce consent fatigue. The framework would enable first-party analytics without consent when specific criteria are met, ending years of uncertainty about the use of legitimate interest for web statistics.

  • University website personalization: First-party data strategies for student recruitment and retention

    University websites receive millions of visits annually from diverse audiences – prospective students, admitted students weighing their options, current undergraduates, graduate students, parents, alumni, and faculty. Yet most institutions serve identical content to all these visitors, missing critical opportunities to engage each audience with relevant information.