Server-side tracking vs. client-side tracking

In analytics, server-side and client-side tracking are methods used to send data collected from a browser to an analytics platform.

In client-side tracking, data is sent directly to the analytics service. This method is popular because it’s well-documented and easy to set up without advanced technical skills. However, the data gathered with this method becomes more and more unreliable.

Server-side tracking offers more control over data collection and processing as well as better quality of data. In this method, data collection happens outside the browser, with communication occurring directly between the website server and the analytics platform.

A hybrid method of server-side tracking, also known as a first-party collector, combines the ease of client-side data collection with the control and security of server-side tracking. Although hybrid tracking might slightly compromise data accuracy because it still partly relies on the browser, it’s more convenient to use than a purely client-side approach.

It’s important to underline that companies using server-side tracking to gather personal data must clearly explain their tracking methods in their privacy policies. They also have to get visitor consent to collect personal data, just like they would with client-side trackers.

Learn more about server-side tracking:


  • Privacy by design in practice: How “just enough” data beats “just in case” collection

    While collecting more data “just in case” feels safer, according to Matt Gershoff, it’s also one of the biggest sources of unnecessary compliance risk, analytical noise, and wasted organizational resources in the analytics industry today. His approach of “just enough” data collection is more intentional, more aligned with privacy regulation, and often more analytically effective.

  • 4 ways to make your analytics HIPAA-compliant: Implementation guide

    Healthcare organizations have four main approaches to achieving HIPAA-compliant analytics. Each has different trade-offs in cost, technical complexity, and analytics capabilities. This guide compares all four implementation methods – from using Google Analytics with workarounds to deploying fully HIPAA-compliant analytics platforms – so you can choose the right approach for your organization’s needs and resources.